In the same vein of thought as the post of the other day, where I ranted and ranted about my inability to express what I wanted freely, without needing to worry about offending my friends (and out of which has come nothing, to date) I missed a key point.
I have lurkers.
I had forgotten this, and part of me does not like the sort of nasty sick thrill of thinking, for some brief moment "Ooh, I'm cool enough that people want to read this journal...go me!" Obviously, part of me does.
As a longtime lurker myself, I know how this goes. I almost never commented on someone else's journal entry out of fear that I would fuck up and be rude accidentally (this is something I still have to work on; my opinions are, to put it mildly, strong.) and of course, the ever popular "They don't want to hear what I have to say." This is, of course, total bollocks, as the only point to engaging in this sort of free therapy is to hear other people reply. Then you can either say "Yeah, that's a good idea," or "They missed the point totally, this is what I meant."
It clarifies your thoughts.
Normally, I'm not bothered by lurkers, or the thought of lurkers. I wish you all would say hi, so that I can talk to you, but not bothered if you don't want to. I don't assume that everyone who friends me reads these long, moaning posts about my life and my anger, so I'm not bothered if no one comments (particularly when I whinge). However, I am a strong believer in freedom of speech, and I have posted (as I recall) two friendslocked entries, both set to specific groups of people.
This leads to the dilemma. Again, I am presented with the decision to go to a friends journal, or to bear in mind that at least two of my lurkers know me in real life (neither has, so far as I know, an lj account). Which leads me back to self-censorship because I really don't know that I want my niece to know that I am into Potterslash, BDSM, bloodplay, breathplay, Carnivorous Wardrobe (where I play a junkie whore, among others, and all of my chars are in some sort of meltdown atm), anger, manipulation of others, hatred, anti-stupidity, and all sorts of things that generally mean I'm not really Rainbow Brite.
This journal is, to some extent, a one sided view of me. Even if I strive to portray events evenhandedly, I can't. I have only one view. I have the public face of myself (which, admittedly, was shaped by two years spent over 5K miles from the possibility of anyone I knew "just dropping by") which is different from the private face, but nonetheless is a specific face. And however much, to make one example, I think that Joe Blow is crazy to bid on Buffet Group stocks when he can't afford a car payment, it is not my decision, and I am not capable of presenting a balanced view. I can only present what I think. It is not possible to climb into someone else's head.
So, reining the post back to the issue of lurkers, I generally assume that people I don't know in real life aren't baby-rapers even though they just wrote chan slash. I assume that their personalities hold together just fine with more information than I have. I do not judge the person by their journals. I judge whether I want to participate, but that's a different issue.
The issue with the lurkers I have that I know in real life is that I don't know what they're planning on doing with this information about me. Quite frankly, should my niece choose to tell her mother about what I write, it would get passed on to my mother, who would disapprove. I'm 27, I live my life the way I want to, and one of the ways I want to is not to worry my mother more than necessary. I do not need her to know that I read slash - not because of issues with homosexuality, since she knows I'm bi and hasn't tried to have me exorcised - but because it would be like what Carrot says in Men At Arms, about how a dwarf's tools need to be melted down when they die because it's like underclothing to humans. YOu wouldn't use someone else's. And that's what Potterslash would be to her - you shouldn't read that anyway (old-school feminist view of porn, dammit) but you certainly shouldn't take children's story characters and do that to them.
And I do not need people in my life or my journal who don't have the balls to tell me I'm full of shit, or that my penchant for throwing goats off bell towers in Mexico scares them. I want to be able to reassure the people I know and love that I am fine, I am not a serial killer, nor a baby rapist, nor even all that angry.
You do not need an lj account to comment to lj. You know my phone number, my email address, and any number of ways to get in touch with me. I do not want to censor myself any more than I already do, and I do not want to resort to locking this journal. I do not want to worry that I'm going to be having a conversation with my mum or with any interested third parties because I talked about my interest in slash chan somnophilia. I want you, o lurkers from real life, to talk to me if you are worried.
The rest of you, of course, are doomed.
This is precisely why I've never tried to find out if any of my other family members have ljs.
In all seriousness, I love to talk about myself. I take pride in honesty. If anyone has a question, ask and I'll answer it truthfully. That does not change if you are a relative.